Joint Ventures for Government Contracts

A joint venture (JV) is one of the most powerful yet misunderstood tools in government contracting. Unlike a simple teaming agreement where one company acts as prime and another as subcontractor, a joint venture creates a new business entity or contractual partnership where both parties share control, risk, and reward.

Joint ventures are particularly valuable in Canadian government procurement for accessing large contracts, combining specialized expertise, and meeting set-aside program requirements. When structured properly, a JV allows two or more firms to present themselves as a single, unified supplier with combined capabilities, financial strength, and past performance.

This guide explains how joint ventures work in Canadian government procurement, how to structure one, the legal considerations, and the pros and cons of this approach. Whether you are considering a JV for a specific opportunity or as a long-term business strategy, this guide covers everything you need to know.

A joint venture in government contracting is a business arrangement where two or more suppliers combine resources, expertise, and capabilities to pursue a government contract as a single entity. The JV can take two forms:

• ✓Contractual Joint Venture: The parties enter into a formal agreement that defines their relationship, roles, and profit-sharing arrangements without creating a separate legal entity. This is the simpler and more common structure for single-contract JVs.
• ✓Corporate Joint Venture: The parties create a new legal entity (such as a corporation or partnership) specifically for the joint venture. This structure is more common for long-term or multi-contract JVs and provides clearer liability protection.[/Checklist

]

]

The key distinction between a JV and a teaming agreement is legal structure. In a teaming agreement, the government contracts with the prime contractor, and the prime contracts with subcontractors. In a JV, the government contracts with the JV entity itself. Both JV partners are jointly and severally liable for performance of the contract, which means each partner can be held responsible for the entire contract.

]

Suppliers form JVs for several strategic reasons:

• ✓Access larger contracts: Two smaller firms can combine to meet the size, capacity, and financial requirements of contracts neither could win alone.
• ✓Combine complementary capabilities: A JV brings together different expertise, equipment, or certifications that together create a more competitive offering.
• ✓Meet set-aside requirements: Some contracts are set aside for specific groups (e.g., Indigenous-owned businesses, small businesses). A JV with a qualifying partner can unlock access to these opportunities.
• ✓Share financial risk: Large contracts carry significant financial exposure. Sharing that risk makes them more manageable.
• ✓Build past performance: A JV allows firms to build a joint track record that benefits both parties in future bidding.
• ✓Geographic expansion: Partnering with a firm in another region helps you expand geographically without building new infrastructure from scratch.
• ✓Access funding and bonding: Combined financial strength makes it easier to secure bonding and financing for large contracts.[/Checklist

]

Joint ventures are also valuable for entering new markets or sectors. If your firm has extensive experience in municipal construction but wants to break into federal infrastructure projects, partnering through a JV with a firm that has federal experience can bridge the gap. Similarly, if you are strong in one region but want to expand nationally, a JV with a firm that has national reach provides immediate credibility and capability.

Structuring a JV properly requires careful legal planning. Here are the essential elements:

• ✓JV Agreement: The foundational document that defines the purpose, duration, governance, and financial arrangements of the joint venture. This is the most important document in any JV.
• ✓Governance Structure: Define how decisions are made. Will there be a management committee? Who has decision-making authority for different types of decisions? How are deadlocks resolved?
• ✓Capital Contributions: Specify what each party contributes — cash, equipment, personnel, facilities, intellectual property. Value these contributions fairly.
• ✓Profit and Loss Sharing: Define how revenue and expenses are shared. This can be proportional to contributions, equal, or based on a formula that reflects each party's role.
• ✓Liability and Indemnification: Address how liabilities are shared. Include indemnification provisions to protect each party from the other's negligence or misconduct.
• ✓Dispute Resolution: Specify how disputes will be resolved, including escalation procedures, mediation, and arbitration. A good dispute resolution process prevents JV breakdowns.
• ✓Exit Strategy: Define how the JV can be terminated, how assets will be distributed, and how ongoing contracts will be handled after dissolution.
• ✓Intellectual Property: Clarify ownership of IP developed during the JV and rights to use pre-existing IP of each party.[/Checklist

]

]

Federal procurement has specific rules about JVs. For example, PSPC requires that JVs be evaluated on the combined experience and capabilities of all partners. The JV must demonstrate that it has the legal capacity to enter into a contract with the Crown. Some federal procurements also require the JV to be registered or have a specific legal structure. Always review the procurement rules carefully before forming a JV for a specific opportunity.

Bidding as a JV follows the same general process as any other bid, but with additional documentation:

• ✓Confirm JV eligibility: Some RFPs specifically allow or prohibit JV bids. Check the solicitation documents to confirm JVs are permitted. If not mentioned, contact the buyer to clarify.
• ✓Submit JV documentation: Most RFPs require the JV agreement, a description of the JV structure, and evidence of the JV's legal capacity to contract.
• ✓Demonstrate combined capabilities: Present the combined experience, personnel, and resources of all JV partners. Highlight how the partnership creates greater value than either firm alone.
• ✓Provide financial statements: You may need to submit financial information from each JV partner to demonstrate the JV's financial capacity.
• ✓Identify key personnel: Specify which individuals from each partner will perform the work. Include their qualifications and experience.
• ✓Detail project management: Explain how the JV will be managed day-to-day, including communication protocols, decision-making processes, and coordination mechanisms.
• ✓Include bonding capacity: If the contract requires bonds, demonstrate the JV's combined bonding capacity.[/Checklist

]

] One challenge in JV bidding is that some evaluation systems are designed for single-entity bids. If the procurement portal or evaluation system cannot easily accommodate a JV, contact the buyer early to clarify how to submit. Buyers are generally accommodating, but they need time to make arrangements. Do not wait until the submission deadline to identify these issues.

• ✓Pros: Access to larger, more complex contracts
• ✓Combined capabilities create stronger proposals
• ✓Shared financial risk reduces exposure for each partner
• ✓Combined past performance strengthens evaluation scores
• ✓Access to set-aside programs through qualifying partners
• ✓Geographic and market expansion without new infrastructure
• ✓Shared bid preparation effort and cost
• ✓Opportunity for long-term strategic partnerships[/Checklist

]

• ✓Cons: Joint and several liability means full exposure if partner defaults
• ✓Legal and administrative complexity adds setup costs
• ✓Decision-making can be slower with multiple stakeholders
• ✓Cultural clashes between partner organizations
• ✓Profit sharing can be contentious
• ✓JV dissolution can be complex and costly
• ✓Potential for disputes over contribution and credit
• ✓Some buyers are hesitant to contract with JVs[/Checklist

]

] Despite the risks, joint ventures are a proven path to winning larger and more complex government contracts. The key is to approach them with eyes wide open — invest in proper legal structuring, choose your partner carefully, and build governance mechanisms that prevent disputes from escalating.

A joint venture is a formal business arrangement where two or more suppliers combine resources and capabilities to pursue government contracts as a single entity. JVs offer access to larger contracts, combined capabilities, risk sharing, and set-aside opportunities. However, they require careful legal structuring, shared decision-making, and a strong partnership foundation. Joint ventures differ from teaming agreements in legal structure and liability. In a JV, all partners are jointly and severally liable for the contract. In a teaming agreement, the prime contractor bears primary liability. Choose the structure that best fits your risk tolerance and the specific opportunity. Your next step is to evaluate whether a JV is right for your business. Assess your capacity, identify complementary partners, and consult with legal counsel experienced in government contracting. Use ContractFinder.ca to find opportunities that may be achievable through a joint venture partnership.

<FAQ Q: What is the difference between a joint venture and a partnership? A: A joint venture is typically formed for a specific project or contract, while a partnership is an ongoing business relationship. JVs are more common in government contracting. Q: Do I need to create a new company for a JV? A: Not necessarily. Contractual JVs use a formal agreement without creating a new legal entity. Corporate JVs create a new company. Q: Can a small business form a JV with a large corporation? A: Yes. This is common, especially when the small business brings specialized expertise or set-aside eligibility. Q: How are JV profits shared? A: Profits are shared according to the JV agreement, which can be proportional to contributions, equal, or based on any agreed formula. Q: Does the government prefer JVs over teaming agreements? A: Neither is inherently preferred. The best structure depends on the contract requirements and the capabilities of the parties involved. Q: Can a JV bid on contracts reserved for small businesses? A: Yes, if the JV meets the small business criteria. Some programs have specific rules about JV eligibility. Q: How is a JV evaluated in a proposal? A: The JV is evaluated as a single entity. The combined experience, capability, and past performance of all partners are assessed together. Q: What happens if a JV partner wants to leave mid-contract? A: This should be addressed in the JV agreement. Typically, the remaining partner must complete the contract or find a replacement. Q: Are JV agreements public? A: No, JV agreements are private contracts between the partners. However, government buyers may request summaries or key terms during evaluation. Q: Can I be in multiple JVs at the same time? A: Yes, as long as there are no conflicts of interest and you have the capacity to fulfill your obligations in each. Q: How long does a JV typically last? A: Many JVs are formed for a single contract and dissolve after completion. Others are established as ongoing arrangements for multiple contracts. Q: What is the biggest risk of a JV? A: Joint and several liability — each partner can be held fully responsible for the entire contract if the other partner defaults. />